4.8 Article

Ohmic resistance affects microbial community and electrochemical kinetics in a multi-anode microbial electrochemical cell

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 331, Issue -, Pages 315-321

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.055

Keywords

Anode potential; Geobacter; Half-saturation anode potential; Microbial electrochemical cells; Multi-anode; Ohmic energy loss

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [STPGP 478972]
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-anode microbial electrochemical cells (MxCs) are considered as one of the most promising configurations for scale-up of MxCs, but understanding of anode kinetics in multiple anodes is limited in the MxCs. In this study we assessed microbial community and electrochemical kinetic parameters for bio-films on individual anodes in a multi-anode MxC to better comprehend anode fundamentals. Microbial community analysis targeting 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing showed that Geobacter genus was abundant (87%) only on the biofilm anode closest to a reference electrode (low ohmic energy loss) in which current density was the highest among three anodes. In comparison, Geobacter populations were less than 1% for biofilms on other two anodes distant from the reference electrode (high ohmic energy loss), generating small current density. Half-saturation anode potential (E-KA) was the lowest at -0.251 to -0.242 V (vs. standard hydrogen electrode) for the closest biofilm anode to the reference electrode, while E-KA was as high as -0.134 V for the farthest anode. Our study proves that electric potential of individual anodes changed by ohmic energy loss shifts biofilm communities on individual anodes and consequently influences electron transfer kinetics on each anode in the multi-anode MxC. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available