4.5 Article

Aluminum Scrap to Hydrogen: Complex Effects of Oxidation Medium, Ball Milling Parameters, and Copper Additive Dispersity

Journal

METALS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met13020185

Keywords

aluminum scrap; copper powders; composite materials; ball milling; phase transformations; intermetallides; aqueous salt solutions; hydrogen generation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An effective combination of oxidation medium, ball milling parameters, and copper additive disperstiy ensuring fast aluminum scrap reaction with high hydrogen yield was suggested. The best results were obtained with 15 mm balls (1 h) which provided the second-finest powder and best preservation of the original Cu and Al phases.
An effective combination of oxidation medium, ball milling parameters, and copper additive disperstiy ensuring fast aluminum scrap reaction with high hydrogen yield, was suggested. Different milling parameters (5, 10, and 15 mm steel balls; 1 and 2 h; unidirectional and bidirectional rotation modes) were tested for Al-10 wt.% Cu (50-70 mu m) composition. The samples milled with 5 (2 h) and 10 mm (1 and 2 h) balls contained undesirable intermetallic phases Al2Cu and Cu9Al4, while those activated with 15 mm balls (1 h) provided the second-finest powder and best preservation of the original Cu and Al phases. Among the tested (at 60 degrees C) 2 M solutions NaCl, LiCl, KCl, MgCl2, ZnCl2, BaCl2, CaCl2, NiCl2, CoCl2, FeCl2, and AlCl3, the first six appeared to be almost useless (below 4% hydrogen yield), the following four provided better results, and the ultimate 91.5% corresponded to AlCl3. Samples with Cu dispersity of 50-100 nm, 1-19, 50-70, and 150-250 mu m, and with no additive, were milled under the optimal parameters and tested in AlCl3. Their total yields were similar (similar to 90-94%), while reaction rates differed. The highest rate was obtained for the sample modified with 50-70 mu m powder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available