4.5 Article

The Effect of Thickness on Strength of Single Lap Orbital Riveted Aluminum/Composite Joints Used in Marine Environments

Journal

METALS
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met12122068

Keywords

orbital riveting; joining; shipbuilding; composite; aluminum

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research on the National Operational Programme Research and Innovation 2014-2020 as part of the project TecHnology And materials for safe Low consumption And low life cycle cost veSSels And crafts (THALASSA) [ARS01_00293]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an innovative vision of manufacturing, orbital riveting is a joining technique that utilizes a rotating tool to create pressure lines around a rivet, resulting in an efficiently formed rivet head. This research investigates the mechanical characteristics and failure modes of multi-material single lap joints, specifically between an aluminum sheet and a glass fiber reinforced laminate, by studying different thickness configurations.
In an innovative vision of manufacturing, orbital riveting is a joining technique characterized by high efficiency, energy saving, low costs and low noise. It is a cold forming process where a tool rotates at a fixed angle (i.e., typically 3 degrees to 6 degrees) to create a sweeping line of pressure around a rivet. This movement progressively promotes, with each rotation, the collapse of the rivet shank down onto the upper substrate of a joint, permanently forming a rivet head. The aim of this research is to make and test multi-material joints between an aluminum AA5083 H111 sheet and a glass fiber reinforced laminate. Specifically, nine configurations of single lap joints were studied by investigating the effect of the thickness (i.e., 2.5, 3.0 and 4.0 mm for the aluminum and 2.5, 3.0 and 4.0 mm for the composite laminate) both on the mechanical characteristics and on the failure modes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available