4.8 Article

Numerical evaluation of crack growth in polymer electrolyte fuel cell membranes based on plastically dissipated energy

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 316, Issue -, Pages 114-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.031

Keywords

Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM); Durability; Fatigue; Cyclic crack growth; Plastically dissipated energy; Numerical simulation

Funding

  1. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Fuel Cell Technologies, of the U.S. Department of Energy through Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the mechanisms of growth of defects in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells is essential for improving cell longevity. Characterizing the crack growth in PEM fuel cell membrane under relative humidity (RH) cycling is an important step towards establishing strategies essential for developing more durable membrane electrode assemblies (MEA). In this study, a crack propagation criterion based on plastically dissipated energy is investigated numerically. The accumulation of plastically dissipated energy under cyclical RH loading ahead of the crack tip is calculated and compared to a critical value, presumed to be a material parameter. Once the accumulation reaches the critical value, the crack propagates via a node release algorithm. From the literature, it is well established experimentally that membranes reinforced with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) reinforced perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) have better durability than unreinforced membranes, and through-thickness cracks are generally found under the flow channel regions but not land regions in unreinforced PFSA membranes. We show that the proposed plastically dissipated energy criterion captures these experimental observations and provides a framework for investigating failure mechanisms in ionomer membranes subjected to similar environmental loads. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available