4.3 Article

Reliability of automatic finish line detection for tooth preparation in dental computer-aided software

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 138-143

Publisher

JAPAN PROSTHODONTIC SOC
DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00344

Keywords

Automatic; Tooth preparation; Finish line registration; Reliability; Dental computer-aided software

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accuracy of automatic tooth finish line registration was compared to manual registration, considering various finish line configurations and dental CAD software. The study found that the automatic method exhibited larger errors than the manual method, especially with high finish line roundness and obtuse edge angles. The choice of CAD software affected the registration accuracy in the automatic method, but not in the manual method.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of automatic tooth finish line registration compared to manual registration with regard to various finish line configurations and dental computer-aided design (CAD) software.Methods: Finish line registrations were performed on 15 digital tooth models with different finish line configurations (edge roundness radius = 0 mm, 0.2 mm, and 0.4 mm; edge angle = 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, 120 degrees, and 150 degrees) using automatic and manual methods for designing virtual copings (N = 150). The discrepancies between the registered finish line extracted from the copings and the actual finish line segmented from the digitized tooth model were measured. Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc analyses with Bonferroni correction (alpha = 0.05) were used to analyze the results.Results: The finish line configurations, registration methods, and CAD software interacted with the accuracy of the reg-istered finish line (p = 0.001). The automatic finish line registration method exhibited larger error values than the manual method, especially at high finish line edge roundness and obtuse edge angles for both EXOCAD and R2CAD software (p < 0.001). The difference in dental CAD software affected the registration accuracy in the automatic method (p < 0.001), but not in the manual method (p = 0.676).Conclusions: Finish line registration errors may occur when the automatic registration method is applied to the indistinct edge of tooth preparation. The accuracy of the automatic finish line registration could differ according to the CAD soft-ware program.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available