Clinical and oncological outcomes in single-stage versus staged surgery for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a multicenter retrospective study

Purpose Craniopharyngiomas (CPGs) are aggressive brain tumors responsible of severe morbidity in children. The best treatment strategies are under debate. Our study evaluates surgical, pituitary, and hypothalamic outcomes of a tailored staged-surgical approach compared to a single-stage radical approach in children with CPGs. Methods Multicenter retrospective study enrolling 96 children treated for CPGs in the period 2010-2022. The surgical management was selected after a multidisciplinary evaluation. Primary endpoint includes the inter-group comparison of preservation/improvement of hypothalamic-pituitary function, the extent of resection, and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), morbidity, and quality of life (QoL). Results Gross Total Resection (GTR) was reached in 46.1% of cases in the single-stage surgery group (82 patients, age at surgery 9 +/- 4.7 years) and 33.3% after the last operation in the staged surgery group (14 patients age 7.64 +/- 4.57 years at first surgery and 9.36 +/- 4.7 years at the last surgery). The PFS was significantly higher in patients addressed to staged- compared to single-stage surgery (93.75% vs 70.7% at 5 years, respectively, p = 0.03). The recurrence rate was slightly higher in the single-stage surgery group. No significant differences emerged in the endocrinological, visual, hypothalamic outcome, OS, and QoL comparing the two groups. Conclusions In pediatric CPGs' surgical radicality and timing of intervention should be tailored considering both anatomical extension and hypothalamic-pituitary function. In selected patients, a staged approach offers a safer and more effective disease control, preserving psychophysical development.

Automated summary

This study compared the outcomes of a staged surgical approach and a single-stage radical approach in children with craniopharyngiomas. The results showed that a staged approach led to higher rates of gross total resection and progression-free survival compared to the single-stage approach, with no significant differences in other outcomes.