4.8 Article

Effects of carbon supports on Pt distribution, ionomer coverage and cathode performance for polymer electrolyte fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 315, Issue -, Pages 179-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.091

Keywords

Carbon-supported Pt catalysts; Effective Pt surface area; Pore structure; Ionomer distribution; Polymer electrolyte fuel cells

Funding

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the effects of the carbon supports on the Pt distribution, ionomer coverage and cathode performance of carbon-supported Pt catalysts, by using STEM observation, N-2 adsorption analysis and electrochemical characterization. According to the STEM observation, the effective Pt surface area (S(e)(Pt)), which is determined by the location and size of the Pt particles on the supports, increases in the following order: c-Pt/CB < c-Pt/GCB < n-Pt/AB800 < n-Pt/AB250. The N-2 adsorption analyses show that the Pt particles observed in the interior of the CB and AB800-supported Pt catalysts during the STEM observation could be ascribed to the hollow structures inside the carbon supports, which decrease their effective Pt surface areas. The S(e)(Pt) values are in good agreement with the cell performance in the high current density region. In spite of the highest Pt utilization (U-Pt) value (>90%) and uniform ionomer coverage, the c-Pt/CB catalyst shows the lowest cell performance due to the lower S(e)(Pt) value. On the other hand, the n-Pt/AB250 catalyst, for which all of the Pt particles exist only on the exterior surface, is found to be the most attractive in order to generate the large current densities required by actual fuel cell operation. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available