4.8 Article

Revisiting Li+ intercalation into various crystalline phases of Nb2O5 anchored on graphene sheets as pseudocapacitive electrodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 309, Issue -, Pages 42-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.087

Keywords

Niobium pentoxide; Graphene; Intercalation pseudocapacitance; Capacitive behavior; Li-ion diffusion coefficient

Funding

  1. MOST [2014CB239702]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [21576090, 21506061, 51302083]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WA1516006]
  4. Shanghai Rising Star Program [15QA1401300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, polycrystalline Nb2O5 nanoparticles including pseudo-hexagonal (TT-), orthorhombic (T-), tetragonal (M-) and monoclinic (H-) phases are uniformly anchored onto graphene sheets through a polyol-mediated solvothermal reaction and post heat-treatment, enabling us to discuss the effect of Nb2O5 crystalline phases on Li+ intercalation process. Electrochemical results show that Li+ intercalation into M- and H-Nb2O5 are also capacitive behavior, exhibiting higher capacity of 650 C g(-1) and 615 C than T- and TT-phases of 585 C g(-1) and 530 C g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1). The higher capacity-retention is also obtained for M- and H-phases (509 and 452 C g(-1)) compared to T- and TT-phases (305 and 207 C g(-1)) at 20 A The high rate performance of H-phase can be explained by higher Li+ diffusion coefficients (D-Li) of 1.6 x 10(-12) cm(2) s(-1), which is almost two order of magnitude higher than TT-phase of 4.7 x 10(-14) cm(2) s(-1). This results indicate that Nb2O5 with various crystal structures shows similar Li+ capacitive intercalation behavior, but more ordered arrangement of unit cell may provide more vacancy for Li+ with the lower diffusion barriers, thus leading to higher rate performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available