4.6 Review

Status Epilepticus in Chromosomal Disorders Associated with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review

Journal

GENES
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14020299

Keywords

Status Epilepticus; Angelman Syndrome; Ring 20 Syndrome; chromosomal disorders; epilepsy; anti-seizure medications

Ask authors/readers for more resources

《》This article reviews the literature evidence on the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of status epilepticus in patients with chromosomal disorders associated with epilepsy. It highlights the frequent occurrence of non-convulsive status epilepticus in Angelman Syndrome and Ring 20 Syndrome. The article also emphasizes the lack of specific therapies for status epilepticus in these patients and calls for further research to better understand their clinical features, treatment options, and outcomes.
Status Epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency resulting from the failure of mechanisms of seizure termination or from the initiation of mechanisms that lead to prolonged seizures. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) identified 13 chromosomal disorders associated with epilepsy (CDAE); data regarding SE occurrence in these patients is lacking. A systematic scoping review was conducted to outline current literature evidence about clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of SE in pediatric and adult patients with CDAE. A total of 373 studies were identified with the initial search; 65 of these were selected and regarded as SE in Angelman Syndrome (AS, n = 20), Ring 20 Syndrome (R20, n = 24), and other syndromes (n = 21). Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is frequently observed in AS and R20. No specific, targeted therapies for SE in CDAE are available to date; anecdotal reports about SE treatment are described in the text, as well as various brief- and long-term outcomes. Further evidence is needed to precisely portray the clinical features, treatment options, and outcomes of SE in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available