4.6 Article

Comprehensive Analysis of Codon Usage in Quercus Chloroplast Genome and Focus on psbA Gene

Journal

GENES
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13112156

Keywords

Quercus species; chloroplast genome; codon usage; context-dependent mutation; translational selection; psbA gene; atypical codons

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the codon usage of oak chloroplast genomes and found no significant differences between genomes, but significant differences within genomes. Oak chloroplast genomes prefer T/A-ending codons.
Quercus (oak) is an important economic and ecological tree species in the world, and it is the necessary feed for oak silkworm feeding. Chloroplasts play an important role in green plants but the codon usage of oak chloroplast genomes is not fully studied. We examined the codon usage of the oak chloroplast genomes in detail to facilitate the understanding of their biology and evolution. We downloaded all the protein coding genes of 26 non-redundant chloroplast reference genomes, removed short ones and those containing internal stop codons, and finally retained 50 genes shared by all genomes for comparative analyses. The base composition, codon bias, and codon preference are not significantly different between genomes but are significantly different among genes within these genomes. Oak chloroplast genomes prefer T/A-ending codons and avoid C/G-ending codons, and the psbA gene has the same preference except for the codons encoding amino acid Phe. Complex factors such as context-dependent mutations are the major factors affecting codon usage in these genomes, while selection plays an important role on the psbA gene. Our study provided an important understanding of codon usage in the oak chloroplast genomes and found that the psbA gene has nearly the same codon usage preference as other genes in the oak chloroplasts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available