4.6 Article

Oculo-Cutaneous Albinism Type 4 (OCA4): Phenotype-Genotype Correlation

Journal

GENES
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13122198

Keywords

oculo-cutaneous albinism; OCA4; hypopigmentation; genetics; foveal hypoplasia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Albinism is a genetic disorder caused by mutations in genes affecting melanin production or transport in the skin, hair, and eyes. At least 20 different genes have been identified to be involved in albinism. This study analyzed 30 OCA4 patients and found two main phenotypes, with a correlation between genotype and phenotype.
Albinism is a genetic disorder, present worldwide, caused by mutations in genes affecting melanin production or transport in the skin, hair and eyes. To date, mutations in at least 20 different genes have been identified. Oculo-cutaneous Albinism type IV (OCA4) is the most frequent form in Asia but has been reported in all populations, including Europeans. Little is known about the genotype-phenotype correlation. We identified two main phenotypes via the analysis of 30 OCA4 patients with a molecularly proven diagnosis. The first, found in 20 patients, is clinically indistinguishable from the classical OCA1 phenotype. The genotype-to-phenotype correlation suggests that this phenotype is associated with homozygous or compound heterozygous nonsense or deletion variants with frameshift leading to translation interruption in the SLC45A2 gene. The second phenotype, found in 10 patients, is characterized by very mild hypopigmentation of the hair (light brown or even dark hair) and skin that is similar to the general population. In this group, visual acuity is variable, but it can be subnormal, foveal hypoplasia can be low grade or even normal, and nystagmus may be lacking. These mild to moderate phenotypes are associated with at least one missense mutation in SLC45A2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available