4.6 Article

Congenital Defects in a Patient Carrying a Novel Homozygous AEBP1 Variant: Further Expansion of the Phenotypic Spectrum of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Classical-like Type 2?

Journal

GENES
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13122358

Keywords

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; AEBP1; ACLP; clEDS2; multiple congenital anomalies; TGF-beta pathway; cleft palate; amniotic band sequence; Poland anomaly

Funding

  1. [739543]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes a patient with a novel AEBP1 pathogenic variant who exhibits a phenotype resembling classical EDS but also includes previously unreported multiple congenital malformations. The study provides a brief summary of the current principal clinical manifestations of clEDS2 and the molecular evidence surrounding the role of AEBP1 in extracellular matrix homeostasis and connective tissue development.
In 2018, a new clinical subtype, caused by biallelic variants in the AEBP1 gene, encoding the ACLP protein, was added to the current nosological classification of the Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS). This new phenotype, provisionally termed EDS classical-like type 2 (clEDS2), has not yet been fully characterized, as only nine cases have been reported to date. Here we describe a patient, homozygous for a novel AEBP1 pathogenic variant (NM_001129.5 c.2123_2124delTG (p.Val708AlafsTer5)), whose phenotype is reminiscent of classical EDS but also includes previously unreported multiple congenital malformations. Furthermore, we briefly summarize the current principal clinical manifestations of clEDS2 and the molecular evidence surrounding the role of AEBP1 in the context of extracellular matrix homeostasis and connective tissue development. Although a different coexisting etiology for the multiple congenital malformations of our patient cannot be formally excluded, the emerging role of ACLP in TGF-beta and WNT pathways may explain their occurrence and the phenotypical variability of clEDS2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available