4.6 Review

Materials Design for N2O Capture: Separation in Gas Mixtures

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12121539

Keywords

N2O adsorption; N2O; CO2 selectivity; porous materials; MOFs; zeolites; activated carbons

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain) [PID2021-126235OB-C32]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [UMA18-FEDERJA-126]
  3. FEDER funds
  4. University of Malaga (Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adsorption of greenhouse gases as a cost-effective method to reduce emissions is easier to implement industrially than other technologies. While most research focuses on CO2 capture, there is limited research on N2O capture despite its significant impact on climate. Designing selective adsorbents is crucial to capture and separate gases and mitigate the effects of climate change.
The adsorption of greenhouse gases (GHG) as a method to reduce their emissions into the atmosphere is an alternative that is easier to implement industrially and cheaper than other existing technologies, such as chemical capture, cryogenic separation, or membrane separation. The vast majority of works found in the literature have focused their efforts on capturing CO2 as it is the largest GHG. However, although N2O emissions are not as large as CO2, the impact that N2O has on the stratosphere and climate is much larger in proportion, despite which there is not much research on N2O capture. Since both gases are usually emitted into the atmosphere together (along with other gases), it is necessary to design selective adsorbents capable of capturing and separating these gases from each other and from other gases, to mitigate the effects of climate change. This review aims to compile the existing information to date on porous adsorbents, the characteristics of the N2O adsorption processes and, above all, aims to focus the reader's gaze on the importance of designing selective adsorbents for greenhouse gas mixtures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available