4.6 Article

Heteroepitaxial Growth of GaP Photocathode by Hydride Vapor Phase Epitaxy for Water Splitting and CO2 Reduction

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12111482

Keywords

hydride vapor phase epitaxy; Zn-doping; water splitting; CO2 reduction; photoelectrochemical performance

Funding

  1. STINT
  2. Olle Engkvists stiftelse
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  4. [CH2020-8716]
  5. [200-0555]
  6. [51972210]
  7. [52111530187]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heteroepitaxial Zn-doped p-GaP materials were grown on different substrates using hydride vapor phase epitaxy and processed into photoelectrodes for water splitting and CO2 reduction. The results showed that the heteroepitaxial GaP with suitable Zn doping concentration exhibited comparable photoelectrochemical performance to homoepitaxial GaP, but high defect density was observed in the GaP/Si samples.
Heteroepitaxial Zn-doped p-GaP was grown on (001) GaAs, (001) Si and (111) Si substrates by hydride vapor phase epitaxy for solar-driven photoelectrochemical applications of hydrogen generation by water splitting and CO2 reduction. Growth of GaP on Si was realized through the implementation of a low-temperature buffer layer, and the morphology and crystalline quality were enhanced by optimizing the precursor flows and pre-heating ambient substrate. The p-GaP/GaAs and p-GaP/Si samples were processed to photoelectrodes with an amorphous TiO2 coating for CO2 reduction and a combination of TiO2 layer and mesoporous tungsten phosphide catalyst for water splitting. P-GaP/GaAs with suitable Zn-doping concentration exhibited photoelectrochemical performance comparable to homoepitaxial p-GaP/GaP for water splitting and CO2 reduction. Degradation of photocurrent in p-GaP/Si photoelectrodes is observed in PEC water splitting due to the high density of defects arising from heteroepitaxial growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available