4.6 Article

Wavelength Dependence of the Photocatalytic Performance of Pure and Doped TiO2 Photocatalysts-A Reflection on the Importance of UV Excitability

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12121492

Keywords

TiO2; visible light; UV light; solar irradiation; apparent quantum yield

Funding

  1. Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office-NKFIH [FK_20_135202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the photocatalytic performances of doped and non-doped TiO2 photocatalysts under solar and various types of artificial irradiation. The results showed that the non-doped TiO2 had higher photocatalytic efficiency than the highly visible-light-active TiO2 under natural solar irradiation. Further experiments revealed a lower photocatalytic efficiency in the visible range, even for the most visible-light-active TiO2.
The photocatalytic performances of doped and non-doped TiO2 photocatalysts (TiO2-s) were compared under solar and various types of artificial irradiation using phenol as a model contaminant. Non-doped (mainly anatase phase) TiO2-s had significantly higher photocatalytic efficiency than highly visible-light-active TiO2-s under natural solar irradiation. To explain these unexpected results, we measured the wavelength dependence of photocatalytic efficiency at six different wavelength ranges (lambda = 300-650 nm). For this purpose, UV fluorescence tubes and five LED lights of different colors (violet, blue, green, yellow, and red) were used to activate the photocatalysts. The photon fluxes of the irradiation were measured, and apparent quantum yields were calculated for all irradiation conditions. The highest apparent quantum yield was 1.43% for our own TiO2 (prepared via flame hydrolysis) under UV irradiation. However, apparent quantum yields were significantly lower (by 1-2 orders of magnitude) in the visible range, even for the most visible-light-active TiO2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available