4.5 Review

Prevalence of depression and anxiety among myasthenia gravis (MG) patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2840

Keywords

anxiety; depression; MG; systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to review the prevalence of depression and anxiety in MG patients and found that the prevalence of depression was 36% and the prevalence of anxiety was 33%. Depression and anxiety are major psychiatric concerns among MG individuals and require more attention.
ObjectiveMyasthenia gravis (MG) people experience adverse psychiatric outcomes, which may impact on their life and disturb their daily activity. Depression and anxiety are identified as significant psychiatric problems that MG people face. However, there is no sufficient epidemiological information about depression and anxiety-based publication. Due to this limitation, the aim of this study was to review the prevalence of depression and anxiety in MG patients. MethodsOriginal and international databases were searched to find papers about the estimation of anxiety and depression. Random-effects analysis was used for calculating the proportions of anxiety and depression. For estimating anxiety and depression based the severity, instruments, type of studies, and study regions, subgroup analysis was performed. Results38 studies met inclusion criteria and entered study. The pooling of the prevalence of depression was found at 36%, (95% CI 28% to 45%). Also, prevalence of anxiety was found at 33%, (95% CI 25% to 42%). Prevalence of depression based on mild, moderate, and severe level was 27%, 14%, and 9%, respectively. ConclusionsAnxiety and depression are a major concern among MG individuals. The estimation of both anxiety and depression are high even when compared to other autoimmune diseases. It seems depression and anxiety are important issues and more attention needs to be paid to these psychiatric disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available