4.5 Article

Spatial distribution and influencing factors of urban soil organic carbon stocks in Xi'an City, China

Journal

URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 677-688

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-022-01316-6

Keywords

Urban soil; Urbanization; Soil organic carbon; Spatial variability; Land-use type

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon density (DSOC) in Xi'an City Ring Expressway, China. The results showed that DSOC was higher in urban center and decreased towards suburb, and it was also influenced by land-use types. The findings provide a scientific foundation for future soil carbon management in urban development.
Urban soil organic carbon (SOC) plays an important role in urban ecosystem services. Rapid urbanization and anthropogenic disturbances have created complex and dynamic land-use patterns and heterogeneous urban landscapes, however, the impact of these patterns on the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon density (DSOC) remains unclear. This study investigated SOC using a spatial sampling method from 213 sites in Xi'an City Ring Expressway, China. The results showed that the DSOC ranged from 1.79 to 4.93 kg m(-2), with a mean of 3.31 kg m(-2), and the value of Dsoc was decreased from city center toward suburb with a significant spatial heterogeneity. The DSOC varied with land-use types, being higher in parks, transportation, commercial, and public lands than in industrial, agricultural, parking, and construction lands. The Dsoc was positively related to population density, normalized difference impervious surface index, road density, and landscape shape index, while negatively to aggregation index and patch richness density. Overall, the urbanization of Xi'an City has strongly affected the soil C stocks, and the capacity of urban soils to store C was sustainable. These findings lays a scientific foundation for future soil carbon management in urban development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available