4.3 Article

A bi-Level programming method for SPaT estimation at fixed-time controlled intersections using license plate recognition data

Journal

TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1045-1070

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2023.2165191

Keywords

Fixed-time signalized intersection; signal phase and timing (SPaT) estimation; license plate recognition data; bi-level programming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a SPaT estimation method using license plate recognition (LPR) data for fixed-time controlled intersections. The SPaT estimation problem is formulated as a bi-level programming model to find the optimal match between the phase boundaries and the LPR passing time series. Evaluation with an empirical case and comparison with an existing method demonstrate the potential for practical application, with phase duration estimation accuracies reaching 90.0%.
Signal phase and timing (SPaT) information is a necessary input for traffic performance evaluation. However, current SPaT estimation studies mainly focus on estimation of cycle length or green time of a certain movement, and are realized mostly by floating car data whose data quality significantly affects the estimation accuracy. As license plate recognition (LPR) systems are becoming a widely implemented and reliable data source in China, in this study, a SPaT estimation method is proposed using the LPR data for fixed-time controlled intersections. The SPaT estimation problem is formulated as a bi-level programming model to find the optimal match between the phase boundaries and the LPR passing time series in the study period. Evaluation is done with an empirical case and compared with an existing method, results show that the estimation accuracies of the phase duration can reach 90.0%, outperforming the existing method and demonstrating great potential for practical application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available