4.3 Article

On the existence and uniqueness properties of the Hoogendoorn-Bovy pedestrian flow model

Journal

TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 912-937

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2022.2146022

Keywords

Pedestrian flow; path-choice; dynamic continuum model; existence; uniqueness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Hoogendoorn-Bovy (HB) pedestrian flow model. The results show that the HB model can be transformed into a forward conservation law equation and a backward Hamilton-Jacobi equation, ensuring the existence and uniqueness of solutions for both equations when suitable parameters are chosen.
This study addresses the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Hoogendoorn-Bovy (HB) pedestrian flow model, which describes the dynamic user-optimal pedestrian flow assignment problem in continuous space and time. The HB model consists of a forward conservation law (CL) equation that governs density and a backward Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation that contains a maximum admissible speed constraint (MASC), in which the flow direction is determined by the path-choice strategy. The existence and uniqueness of solutions are significantly more difficult to determine when the HJB equation contains an MASC; however, we prove that the HB model can be formulated as a forward CL equation and backward Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) equation in which the MASC is non-binding if suitable model parameters are selected. This model is formulated as a fixed-point problem upon the simultaneous satisfaction of both equations. To verify the existence and uniqueness results, we first demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of the solutions to the CL and HJ equations, and then show that the coupled HB model is well-posed and has a unique solution. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the properties of the HB model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available