4.8 Article

Detailed study of heat generation in porous LiCoO2 electrodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 307, Issue -, Pages 199-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.096

Keywords

Heat generation; Battery; Lithium-ion; LiCoO2

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the Excellent Battery - WING center Batteries-Mobility in Saxony [03X4637D]
  2. European Union
  3. Free State of Saxony via project LTA4ITM [100096878]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work the heat generation in porous LiCoO2 based electrodes for lithium ion batteries is studied in detail. Irreversible heat generation rates due to ohmic resistance, charge transfer and mass transport limitations as well as the reversible heat of the electrode reaction are determined from electrochemical measurements as a function of the C-rate, the temperature and the lithium concentration in the active material. The results show that all the individual heat sources contribute significantly to the total heat generation in the electrode. The heat sources are functions of the C-rate and the temperature as well as the lithium concentration in the active material. The reversible heat contribution was found to be most significant at higher temperatures and lower C-rates, which tend to reduce kinetic limitations and irreversible heats, respectively. The heat generation rate due to mass transport limitations is most influential among the irreversible heats, whereas the ohmic contribution shows a minor impact. The total heat generation was found to increase with increasing C-rate and decreasing temperature. Furthermore, the heat generation is significantly reduced for charging compared to discharging due to the intrinsic asymmetry of the reversible heat and larger kinetic limitations for lithiation compared to delithiation of LiCoO2. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available