4.8 Article

In-situ, non-destructive acoustic characterization of solid state electrolyte cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 324, Issue -, Pages 126-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.062

Keywords

Acoustic; Elastic moduli; Microcracks; Dendrite

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) program [DE-EE0991-1663]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Advanced Battery Material Research (BMR) program [DE-EE0991-1663]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid-state electrolytes such as cubic Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) can enable solid-state batteries, metallic lithium anodes and higher voltage cathodes. However, the stability of cubic LLZO is affected by current density. In beta alumina solid electrolyte, microstructural failure was caused by Na dendrite penetration, and was shown to be a function of the fracture toughness, K-IC. The relationship between dendrite penetration and K-IC indicates electronic failure is related to creation of microstructural damage, and the microstructural damage may be used as an indicator of imminent electronic failure. To monitor micro structural damage during cycling, we developed a non-invasive, in-situ cell monitoring apparatus to help to correlate mechanical stability with Li-ion current density in LLZO. A pulse-echo transducer was integrated into all solid-state Li-LLZO-Li cells. The capability enables the characterization of microscopic inhomogeneities through the careful measurement of changes to the elastic moduli. The elastic moduli and fracture toughness have been previously reported for dense (>99%) specimens, but monitoring of the relative change in moduli during cycling has not been explored. In this study, an acoustic monitoring method is presented to monitor LLZO specimens during cycling. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available