4.6 Article

Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Selecting a Wind Farm Site Using a Geographic Information System (GIS)

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142214742

Keywords

wind energy; GIS; site selection; multi-criteria decision method; windfarm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wind energy is an attractive option in terms of economics, technology, and environment. Subsidies for fossil fuels have been the major obstacle to developing renewable resources in Iran. This study used a multi-criteria decision method to identify wind energy potential in Khuzestan province. The results show different cities have the most potential from economic and technical viewpoints.
Wind energy is an economically, technically, and environmentally attractive option due to its cheapness and availability in different regions. The most important obstacle to developing renewable resources in Iran is subsidies for fossil fuels. The Iranian government has recently decided to reduce subsidies for electricity and fossil fuels, which has led to an increase in the prices of fossil fuels and electricity and makes renewable technologies more attractive to use. This study uses a multi-criteria decision method to identify wind energy potential in Khuzestan province. A GIS is used to determine the wind energy potential in this province. The technical, environmental, and economic criteria, which are a total of 14 layers of information, were examined by considering different values for each and from a Boolean point of view. The results show that, from the economic point of view, Shadegan city has the most potential and, from the technical point of view, Khorramshahr city has the highest amount of electricity production through wind energy. Furthermore, Dasht-e Azadegan city, due to its population, can supply the maximum amount of electricity it needs through wind energy. Among the three 550, 2500, and 8000 kW turbines, the 550 kW turbine has the most potential in the region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available