4.6 Article

Improved Recovery of Overloaded Anaerobic Batch Reactors by Graphene Oxide

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15032224

Keywords

anaerobic digestion; graphene oxide; methane production kinetics; overloaded conditions; modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to test whether graphene oxide (GO) helps overloaded anaerobic reactors recover faster. The results showed that while GO did not alleviate the acidification effects, the kinetic constants of the GO-amended assays reached values similar to or even above the controls during the final phase. Additionally, a concentration of up to 20 mg(GO)/g(VS) had no impact on FOS/TAC.
Anaerobic digestion reactors may suffer from acidification when overloading occurs. Carbon-based materials are amended to mitigate the souring effects of excessive loading. This study aims to test if graphene oxide (GO) helps overloaded anaerobic reactors recover faster. Batch tests were conducted following a fed-batch strategy at different GO levels (0, 10, and 20 mg GO per g of volatile solid (VS)) and different inoculum substrate ratios (ISRs) of 2, 1, and 0.75 based on VS. While an ISR of 2 was initially applied, the ISR was decreased to 1 and 0.75 in two parallel sets of experiments to simulate overloading conditions at the fourth feeding cycle. Lastly, an ISR of 2 was restored in all assays. First-order model kinetic constants confirmed a significant (p < 0.05) effect by GO from the third feed on. Although the GO-amended assays did not alleviate the acidification effects, during the final phase the kinetic constants reached values similar to or even above the controls (without GO). Moreover, a GO concentration up to 20 mg(GO)/g(VS) had no impact on FOS/TAC. Overall, this study broadens the understanding of the design and operation of anaerobic reactors amended with GO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available