4.6 Article

Hybrid Project Management between Traditional Software Development Lifecycle and Agile Based Product Development for Future Sustainability

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15021121

Keywords

agile; project management; product management; hybrid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this review is to explore the future sustainability of project management by combining agile methodology and product management. As digital transformation evolves rapidly, the question arises whether traditional project management is sustainable. To ensure sustainability, a hybrid approach is adopted by combining agile methodology with traditional project management to keep up with the latest trends in software development approaches. Agile methodologies were developed in 2000 but only widely used since 2011 in software development. This paper will focus on the types of agile requirements engineering methods used in the agile framework, as described in various articles, journals, and studies over the past six years, and how they can be applied in conjunction with traditional project management.
The purpose of this review is to look at the future sustainability of project management by combining agile methodology and product management. Digital transformation is evolving rapidly, and the question is whether traditional project management is sustainable. To ensure sustainability, a hybrid approach is taken by combining agile methodology to ensure the latest trend in software development approaches are maintained. Agile methodologies were crafted in 2000, but it has only been widely used since 2011 for software development. This paper will focus on the types of agile requirements engineering methods used in the agile framework, used and described in various articles, journals, and studies over the last six years, and how this can be applied together with traditional project management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available