4.6 Article

Health and Environmental Co-Benefits of City Urban Form in Latin America: An Ecological Study

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142214715

Keywords

cities; Latin America; population density; air pollution; green space; risk factors; co-benefits

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [205177/Z/16/Z]
  2. Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health [DP5OD26429]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationship between urban landscape profiles and health and environmental outcomes, and explores the potential co-benefits. The study uses data from 208 cities in 8 Latin American countries and defines four urban landscape profiles based on fragmentation, isolation, and shape of patches. The findings suggest that different landscape profiles are associated with varying co-benefits, and certain profiles have positive or negative effects on health and environmental outcomes.
We investigated the association of urban landscape profiles with health and environmental outcomes, and whether those profiles are linked to environmental and health co-benefits. In this ecological study, we used data from 208 cities in 8 Latin American countries of the SALud URBana en America Latina (SALURBAL) project. Four urban landscape profiles were defined with metrics for the fragmentation, isolation, and shape of patches (contiguous area of urban development). Four environmental measures (lack of greenness, PM2.5, NO2, and carbon footprint), two cause-specific mortality rates (non-communicable diseases and unintentional injury mortality), and prevalence of three risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) for adults were used as the main outcomes. We used linear regression models to evaluate the association of urban landscape profiles with environmental and health outcomes. In addition, we used finite mixture modeling to create co-benefit classes. Cities with the scattered pixels profile (low fragmentation, high isolation, and compact shaped patches) were most likely to have positive co-benefits. Profiles described as proximate stones (moderate fragmentation, moderate isolation, and irregular shape) and proximate inkblots (moderate-high fragmentation, moderate isolation, and complex shape) were most likely to have negative co-benefits. The contiguous large inkblots profile (low fragmentation, low isolation, and complex shape) was most likely to have mixed benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available