4.6 Article

Modeling Chinese Secondary School Students' Behavioral Intentions to Learn Artificial Intelligence with the Theory of Planned Behavior and Self-Determination Theory

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15010605

Keywords

artificial intelligence; behavioral intention; competence; autonomy; social good

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is now essential for learners to acquire basic literacy and competencies in artificial intelligence (AI). Although educators are designing AI curricula, there is a lack of empirical studies on students' perceptions of learning AI. This study developed a research model integrating the theory of planned behavior and the self-determination theory to explain students' behavioral intention to learn AI. The findings suggest that the design of learning resources, autonomy, and AI for social good significantly predict students' intention to learn AI, providing insights for the development of AI education in schools.
It has become essential for current learners to gain basic literacy and competencies for artificial intelligence (AI). While educators and education authorities are beginning to design AI curricula, empirical studies on students' perceptions of learning AI are still rare. This study examined a research model that synthesized the theory of planned behavior and the self-determination theory. The model explains students' behavioral intention to learn AI. The model depicts the interrelationships among the factors of AI knowledge, programming efficacy, autonomy, AI for social good, and learning resources. The participants were 509 secondary school students who completed a series of AI lessons and a survey. The factor analyses revealed that our proposed instrument in the survey possesses construct validity and good reliability. Our further analysis supported that design of learning resources, autonomy, and AI for social good predicted behavioral intention to learn AI. However, unexpected findings were presented (i.e., AI knowledge failed to predict social good and programming efficacy negatively influenced autonomy). The findings serve as a reference for the future development of AI education in schools by noting that the design of the AI curriculum should take students' needs and satisfaction into account to facilitate their continuous development of AI competencies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available