4.6 Article

In-Process Analysis of Melt Pool Fluctuations with Scanning Optical Coherence Tomography for Laser Welding of Copper for Quality Monitoring

Journal

MICROMACHINES
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13111937

Keywords

optical coherence tomography; interferometry; laser welding; copper; process monitoring; feature engineering; machine learning; quality monitoring; melt pool

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an inline process monitoring technology that can be used for laser welding to measure weld depth and width, as well as identify fluctuations in the keyhole. By varying laser processing parameters, different weld statuses can be classified, providing feedback on possible defects.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an inline process monitoring technology for laser welding with various applications in the pre-, in-, and post-process. In-process monitoring with OCT focuses on the measurement of weld depth by the placement of a singular measurement beam into the keyhole. A laterally scanned measurement beam gives the opportunity to measure the keyhole and melt pool width. The processing region can be identified by separating higher signal intensities on the workpiece surface from lower signal intensities from the keyhole and the melt pool. In this work, we apply a scanned measurement beam for the identification of keyhole fluctuations. Different laser processing parameters are varied for laser welding of copper to evoke welds in the heat conduction regime, stable deep penetration welding, and unstable deep penetration welding. As keyhole instabilities can be related to the generation of spatter and other defects, we identified a feature for the classification of different weld statuses. In consequence, feedback can be given about possible defects which are originated in keyhole fluctuations (e.g., spatter).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available