4.6 Article

Thermoelectric Power-Factor of Ag-Doped TiO2 Thin Film

Journal

MICROMACHINES
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13122169

Keywords

titanium dioxide; silver; rutile phase; nanostructure; doping; thermoelectric power-factor; thermoelectric

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education [FP092-2020, FRGS/1/2020/TK0/UM/02/25]
  2. Universiti Malaya [GPF014A-2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermoelectric power-factor of Ag-doped nanostructured-TiO2 thin films was investigated, and it was observed that the power-factor increased with increasing Ag concentration. The bilayer structure showed a three times greater increase compared to the undoped bilayer structure. This enhancement can be attributed to the increase in electrical conductivity, compensating for the small changes in the Seebeck coefficient.
The thermoelectric power-factor of two types of rutile-phased nanostructured-TiO2 thin films doped with Ag was investigated at room temperature, by measuring their Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity. The thin films, consisting of a nanorod structure (single layer) and nanorod and nanoflower structure (bilayer) of TiO2, with the addition of different wt.% of AgNO3 were synthesized on an F:SnO2-coated glass substrate. The evaluated thermoelectric power-factor was observed to increase with an increasing wt.% of AgNO3 for both structures, with the bilayer structure increasing three times more than the undoped bilayer-structure, with a value of 148 mu Wm-K-1(-2) at 0.15 wt.%. This enhancement was due to the increase in electrical conductivity, which compensated for the small changes in the Seebeck coefficient, which were likely due to the increase in carrier concentration. Consequently, an enhancement in the thermoelectric conversion-efficiency of TiO2 thin film may be observed by Ag doping, without influencing the layer structure and material phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available