4.4 Article

Measurement of beauty production via non-prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN=5.02 TeV

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2022)126

Keywords

Heavy Ion Experiments; Heavy Quark Production; Quark Gluon Plasma

Funding

  1. Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) collaboration
  2. A.I. Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation (ANSL)
  3. State Committee of Science and World Federation of Scientists (WFS), Armenia
  4. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M 2467-N36]
  5. Nationalstiftung fur Forschung
  6. Technologie und Entwicklung, Austria
  7. Ministry of Communications and High Technologies
  8. National Nuclear Research Center, Azerbaijan
  9. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  10. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep)
  11. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  12. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil
  13. Ministry of Education of China (MOEC)
  14. Ministry of Science & Technology of China (MSTC) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), China
  15. Ministry of Science and Education and Croatian Science Foundation, Croatia
  16. Centro de Aplicaciones Tecnologicas y Desarrollo Nuclear (CEADEN), Cubaenergia, Cuba
  17. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic
  18. Danish Council for Independent Research | Natural Sciences
  19. VILLUM FONDEN and Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF), Denmark
  20. Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP), Finland
  21. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (CEA)
  22. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3)
  23. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France
  24. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) and GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Germany
  25. General Secretariat for Research and Technology
  26. Ministry of Education, Research and Religions, Greece
  27. National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary
  28. Department of Atomic Energy Government of India (DAE), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (DST)
  29. University Grants Commission, Government of India (UGC) and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India
  30. Indonesian Institute of Science, Indonesia
  31. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy
  32. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Japan
  33. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia (CONACYT) y Tecnologia, through Fondo de Cooperacion Internacional en Ciencia y Tecnologia (FONCICYT) and Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico (DGAPA), Mexico
  34. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), The Netherlands
  35. Research Council of Norway, Norway
  36. Commission on Science and Technology for Sustainable Development in the South (COMSATS), Pakistan
  37. Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru
  38. Ministry of Education and Science
  39. National Science Centre and WUT ID-UB, Poland
  40. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Republic of Korea
  41. Ministry of Education and Scientific Research, Institute of Atomic Physics, Ministry of Research and Innovation and Institute of Atomic Physics and University Politehnica of Bucharest, Romania
  42. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR)
  43. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  44. ational Research Centre Kurchatov Institute
  45. Russian Science Foundation and Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Russia
  46. Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia
  47. National Research Foundation of South Africa, South Africa
  48. Swedish Research Council (VR) and Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW), Sweden
  49. European Organization for Nuclear Research, Switzerland
  50. Suranaree University of Technology (SUT)
  51. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSDTA)
  52. Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) and National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), Thailand
  53. Turkish Energy, Nuclear and Mineral Research Agency (TENMAK), Turkey
  54. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  55. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), United Kingdom
  56. National Science Foundation of the United States of America (NSF) and United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics (DOE NP), United States of America

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production rate of non-prompt D-0 mesons was measured in Pb-Pb collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of root s(NN)=5.02TeV. The data indicates a significant suppression of non-prompt D-0 mesons, especially at high momentum, in the 0-10% centrality class of Pb-Pb collisions. Models suggest that this suppression is caused by the lower energy loss of beauty quarks compared to charm quarks in the quark-gluon plasma due to their larger mass.
The production of non-prompt D-0 mesons from beauty-hadron decays was measured at midrapidity (vertical bar y vertical bar < 0.5) in Pb-Pb collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of root s(NN) = 5.02TeV with the ALICE experiment at the LHC. Their nuclear modification factor (R-AA), measured for the first time down to p(T) = 1 GeV/ c in the 0-10% and 30-50% centrality classes, indicates a significant suppression, up to a factor of about three, for p(T) > 5 GeV/ c in the 0-10% central Pb-Pb collisions. The data are described by models that include both collisional and radiative processes in the calculation of beauty-quark energy loss in the quark-gluon plasma, and quark recombination in addition to fragmentation as a hadronisation mechanism. The ratio of the non-prompt to prompt D-0-meson R-AA is larger than unity for p(T) > 4 GeV/c in the 0-10% central Pb-Pb collisions, as predicted by models in which beauty quarks lose less energy than charm quarks in the quark-gluon plasma because of their larger mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available