4.6 Article

Constructing a 700 Wh kg-1-level rechargeable lithium-sulfur pouch cell

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 181-186

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.09.029

Keywords

Lithium-sulfur batteries; Pouch cell; High energy density; Lithium polysulfides

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully constructs a Li-S pouch cell with an energy density of 700 Wh kg-1, achieving high specific capacity and energy density through optimization of the structure and components.
Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are considered as highly promising energy storage devices because of their ultrahigh theoretical energy density of 2600 Wh kg-1. The highest practical energy density of Li- S batteries reported at pouch cell level has exceeded 500 Wh kg-1, which significantly surpasses that of lithium-ion batteries. Herein, a 700 Wh kg-1-level Li-S pouch cell is successfully constructed. The pouch cell is designed at 6 Ah level with high-sulfur-loading cathodes of 7.4 mgS cm-2, limited anode excess (50 lm in thickness), and lean electrolyte (electrolyte to sulfur ratio of 1.7 gelectrolyte gS-1). Accordingly, an ultrahigh specific capacity of 1563 mA h g-1 is achieved with the addition of a redox comediator to afford a practical energy density of 695 Wh kg-1 based on the total mass of all components. The pouch cell can operate stably for three cycles and then failed due to rapidly increased polarization at the second discharge plateau. According to failure analysis, electrolyte exhaustion is suggested as the key limiting factor. This work achieves a significant breakthrough in constructing high-energy-density Li-S batteries and propels the development of Li-S batteries toward practical working conditions. (c) 2022 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available