Journal
FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1068840
Keywords
bla(NDM); minocycline; meropenem; synergy; endemic
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the susceptibility profile of 356 clinical isolates of carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and examined the association between drug synergy and molecular determinants. The majority of CRAB isolates showed multidrug resistance and carried multiple carbapenemase encoding genes. The study also suggests that tigecycline, minocycline, and polymyxins could be potential treatment options for CRAB isolates with more than one carbapenemase encoding genes.
BackgroundThe rapid emergence of carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) has resulted in an alarming situation worldwide. Realizing the dearth of literature on susceptibility of CRAB in genetic context in the developing region, this study was performed to determine the susceptibility profile against standard drugs/combinations and the association of in-vitro drug synergy with the prevalent molecular determinants. Methods and findingsA total of 356 clinical isolates of A. baumannii were studied. Confirmation of the isolates was done by amplifying recA and ITS region genes. Susceptibility against standard drugs was tested by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), MIC50 and MIC90 values against imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, ampicillin/sulbactam, minocycline, amikacin, polymyxin B, colistin and tigecycline was tested as per guidelines. Genes encoding enzymes classes A (bla(GES), bla(IMI/NMC-A), bla(SME), bla(KPC)), B (bla(IMP), bla(VIM), bla(NDM)) and D (bla(OXA-51,) bla(OXA-23) and bla(OXA-58)) were detected by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Synergy against meropenem-sulbactam and meropenem-colistin combinations was done by checkerboard MIC method. Correlation of drug synergy and carbapenemase encoding genes was statistically analyzed. ResultsOf the total, resistance above 90% was noted against gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole and piperacillin/tazobactam. By MIC, resistance rates from highest to lowest was seen against imipenem 89.04% (n=317), amikacin 80.33% (n=286), meropenem 79.49% (n=283), doripenem 77.80% (n=277), ampicillin/sulbactam 71.62% (n=255), tigecycline 55.61% (n=198), minocycline 14.04% (n=50), polymyxin B 10.11% (n=36), and colistin 2.52% (n=9). CRAB was 317 (89.04%), 81.46% (n=290) were multidrug resistant and 13.48% (n=48) were extensively drug resistant. All the CRAB isolates harboured bla(OXA-51) gene (100%) and 94% (n=298) bla(OXA-23) gene. The bla(IMP) gene was most prevalent 70.03% (n=222) followed by bla(NDM,) 59.62% (n=189). Majority (87.69%, 278) were co-producers of classes D and B carbapenemases, bla(OXA-23) with bla(IMP) and bla(NDM) being the commonest. Synergy with meropenem-sulbactam and meropenem-colistin was 47% and 57% respectively. Reduced synergy (p= <0.0001) was noted for those harbouring bla(OXA-51)+bla(OXA-23)with bla(NDM) gene alone or co-producers. ConclusionPresence of bla(NDM) gene was a significant cause of synergy loss in meropenem-sulbactam and meropenem-colistin. In bla(NDM) endemic regions, tigecycline, minocycline and polymyxins could be viable options against CRAB isolates with more than one carbapenemase encoding genes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available