4.8 Article

Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78703

Keywords

BEF; functional diversity; genetic diversity; productivity; trophic feedbacks; Other

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31870409, 32161123003]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB31000000]
  3. Younth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2019082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of plant genetic diversity on plant productivity, and finds that tree species diversity increases tree productivity through increased tree functional diversity and reduced soil fungal diversity. Additionally, in mixed tree species plantations, tree genetic diversity has a positive effect on productivity.
Addressing global biodiversity loss requires an expanded focus on multiple dimensions of biodiversity. While most studies have focused on the consequences of plant interspecific diversity, our mechanistic understanding of how genetic diversity within plant species affects plant productivity remains limited. Here, we use a tree species x genetic diversity experiment to disentangle the effects of species diversity and genetic diversity on tree productivity, and how they are related to tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks. We found that tree species diversity increased tree productivity via increased tree functional diversity, reduced soil fungal diversity, and marginally reduced herbivory. The effects of tree genetic diversity on productivity via functional diversity and soil fungal diversity were negative in monocultures but positive in the mixture of the four tree species tested. Given the complexity of interactions between species and genetic diversity, tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks on productivity, we suggest that both tree species and genetic diversity should be considered in afforestation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available