4.6 Article

First step towards a consensus strategy for multi-locus diagnostic testing of imprinting disorders

Journal

CLINICAL EPIGENETICS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01358-9

Keywords

Imprinting disorders; Genetic testing; Multi-locus testing; Unexpected molecular diagnosis; Overlapping phenotypes; Multi-locus imprinting disorder

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EG 115/13-1]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIIII) of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) [PI20/00950]
  3. European Regional Development Fund
  4. ESPE
  5. Instituto de Salud Carlos III of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) [FIS 20/01053, 20/IMP00009]
  6. Italian Ministry of Health [RC 08C724, 08C502]
  7. Wellcome Trust [WT098395/Z/12/Z]
  8. Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, UK [IS-BRC-1215-20004]
  9. NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  10. Diabetes UK [19/005971]
  11. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [20ek0109373h0003, 22ek0109587]
  12. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Imprinting disorders, which are caused by genetic or epigenetic changes, can affect various aspects including growth, development, metabolism, and risk of neoplasia. Current diagnostic methods involve analyzing gene dosage and methylation, and some laboratories also use multi-locus testing. Our investigation into different testing strategies revealed their impact on diagnostic outcomes.
Background Imprinting disorders, which affect growth, development, metabolism and neoplasia risk, are caused by genetic or epigenetic changes to genes that are expressed from only one parental allele. Disease may result from changes in coding sequences, copy number changes, uniparental disomy or imprinting defects. Some imprinting disorders are clinically heterogeneous, some are associated with more than one imprinted locus, and some patients have alterations affecting multiple loci. Most imprinting disorders are diagnosed by stepwise analysis of gene dosage and methylation of single loci, but some laboratories assay a panel of loci associated with different imprinting disorders. We looked into the experience of several laboratories using single-locus and/or multi-locus diagnostic testing to explore how different testing strategies affect diagnostic outcomes and whether multi-locus testing has the potential to increase the diagnostic efficiency or reveal unforeseen diagnoses. Results We collected data from 11 laboratories in seven countries, involving 16,364 individuals and eight imprinting disorders. Among the 4721 individuals tested for the growth restriction disorder Silver-Russell syndrome, 731 had changes on chromosomes 7 and 11 classically associated with the disorder, but 115 had unexpected diagnoses that involved atypical molecular changes, imprinted loci on chromosomes other than 7 or 11 or multi-locus imprinting disorder. In a similar way, the molecular changes detected in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and other imprinting disorders depended on the testing strategies employed by the different laboratories. Conclusions Based on our findings, we discuss how multi-locus testing might optimise diagnosis for patients with classical and less familiar clinical imprinting disorders. Additionally, our compiled data reflect the daily life experiences of diagnostic laboratories, with a lower diagnostic yield than in clinically well-characterised cohorts, and illustrate the need for systematising clinical and molecular data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available