4.6 Article

Economic Cost of Drought and Potential Benefits of Investing in Nature-Based Solutions: A Case Study in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Journal

WATER
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15030466

Keywords

economic cost of drought; nature-based solutions; economic benefits of NbS; drought resilience; water security; cost-benefit analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite having abundant water resources, Brazil is facing increasing occurrences of extreme hydrological events like droughts and floods. The Sao Paulo Cantareira water supply system (CWSS) presents an opportunity to study the economic benefits of nature-based solutions (NbS) for enhancing water security and mitigating the economic costs of drought. This study examines the potential benefits of a counterfactual NbS land-use scenario compared to the current land use and evaluates the economic viability of NbS investments in the CWSS. The research estimates the economic losses caused by the 2014-2015 drought in Sao Paulo state and assesses the potential cost savings under the NbS scenario, including water supply and carbon sequestration benefits. The results suggest that implementing NbS could have reduced the economic losses of the drought by 28% and that the NbS scenario has a positive net present value for both water supply and carbon sequestration benefits.
Despite its rich water resources, Brazil is increasingly facing extreme hydrologic events such as droughts and floods. The Sao Paulo Cantareira water supply system (CWSS) offers an opportunity to examine the potential economic benefits of nature-based solutions (NbS) to improve water security and reduce the economic cost of drought. This study explores the potential benefits under a counterfactual NbS land-use scenario compared to actual land use and assesses the economic viability of NbS investments in the CWSS. Specifically, we estimate the economic cost of the 2014-2015 drought in Sao Paulo state for the industrial and water sectors served by the CWSS. We estimate the potential avoided costs under the NbS scenario and conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the NbS scenario investments, including both water supply and carbon sequestration benefits. We estimate that the economic losses of this single drought event totaled BRL 1.6 billion. If NbS had been implemented, this cost could have been reduced by 28%. A cost-benefit analysis that includes only the water supply or both the water supply and carbon sequestration benefits indicates that the NbS scenario has a positive net present value of BRL 144 million and BRL 632 million, respectively. Thus, our results highlight the economic viability of the hypothetical NbS investment in mitigating extreme climatic events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available