4.7 Article

Detection of Highly Poisonous Nerium oleander Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR with Specific Primers

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins14110776

Keywords

Nerium oleander; food poisoning; qPCR; specific primers; simulated forensic specimens

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1604701]
  2. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, China (CIFMS) [2021-I2M1-071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A specific and highly sensitive qPCR-based method was developed to identify oleander in this study. The method was validated in mixture systems and simulated forensic specimens, and demonstrated a detection limit of 0.1% in digested samples.
Nerium oleander is one of the most poisonous plants, and its accidental ingestion has frequently occurred in humans and livestock. It is vital to develop a rapid and accurate identification method for the timely rescue of oleander-poisoned patients and the investigation of poisoning cases. In this study, a specific and highly sensitive quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)-based method was developed to identify oleander in mixture systems and simulated forensic specimens (SFS). First, a new pair of oleander-specific primers, JZT-BF/BR, was designed and validated. Then, a qPCR method was developed using the primers, and its detective sensitivity was examined. The results showed that JZT-BF/BR could specifically identify oleander in forage and food mixtures, and qPCR was capable of accurate authentication even at a low DNA concentration of 0.001 ng/mu L. This method was further applied to the analysis of SFS containing different ratios of N. oleander. The method was confirmed to be applicable to digested samples, and the detection limit reached 0.1% (w/w) oleander in mixture systems. Thus, this study undoubtedly provides strong support for the detection of highly toxic oleander and the diagnosis of food poisoning in humans and animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available