4.7 Article

Multi-Scale Graph-Based Feature Fusion for Few-Shot Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14215550

Keywords

few-shot learning; graph-based feature; multi-scale feature fusion; remote sensing image scene classification

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61901376]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021TQ0271, 2021M700110]
  3. national undergraduate innovation and entrepreneurship training program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Few-shot remote sensing image scene classification is a challenging problem. This paper proposes a multi-scale graph-based feature fusion model, which effectively represents spatial relations and integrates different scale information, achieving accurate classification with limited labeled data.
Remote sensing image scene classification has drawn extensive attention for its wide application in various scenarios. Scene classification in many practical cases faces the challenge of few-shot conditions. The major difficulty of few-shot remote sensing image scene classification is how to extract effective features from insufficient labeled data. To solve these issues, a multi-scale graph-based feature fusion (MGFF) model is proposed for few-shot remote sensing image scene classification. In the MGFF model, a graph-based feature construction model is developed to transform traditional image features into graph-based features, which aims to effectively represent the spatial relations among images. Then, a graph-based feature fusion model is proposed to integrate graph-based features of multiple scales, which aims to enhance sample discrimination based on different scale information. Experimental results on two public remote sensing datasets prove that the MGFF model can achieve superior accuracy than other few-shot scene classification approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available