4.7 Review

Detection of Surface Water and Floods with Multispectral Satellites

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14236005

Keywords

multispectral satellite imagery; water detection; flood mapping; multispectral indices

Funding

  1. COST Action [CA16219]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the research progress of satellite remote sensing in water extent delineation and flood monitoring, analyzes the performance of spectral indices for water segmentation in different land cover types, and discusses common issues in dealing with optical imagery and opportunities offered by new-generation passive satellites.
The use of multispectral satellite imagery for water monitoring is a fast and cost-effective method that can benefit from the growing availability of medium-high-resolution and free remote sensing data. Since the 1970s, multispectral satellite imagery has been exploited by adopting different techniques and spectral indices. The high number of available sensors and their differences in spectral and spatial characteristics led to a proliferation of outcomes that depicts a nice picture of the potential and limitations of each. This paper provides a review of satellite remote sensing applications for water extent delineation and flood monitoring, highlighting trends in research studies that adopted freely available optical imagery. The performances of the most common spectral indices for water segmentation are qualitatively analyzed and assessed according to different land cover types to provide guidance for targeted applications in specific contexts. The comparison is carried out by collecting evidence obtained from several applications identifying the overall accuracy (OA) obtained with each specific configuration. In addition, common issues faced when dealing with optical imagery are discussed, together with opportunities offered by new-generation passive satellites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available