4.7 Article

A Machine-Learning Approach to Intertidal Mudflat Mapping Combining Multispectral Reflectance and Geomorphology from UAV-Based Monitoring

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14225857

Keywords

UAV; multispectral; temperate mudflat; geomorphic mapping; random forest classification; microphytobenthos; oyster reefs

Funding

  1. Tosca-CNES, project HypEddy
  2. Region Nouvelle-Aquitaine, project PROVIDE [2018-1R20301]
  3. France-Berkeley Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Remote sensing is a useful method for mapping inaccessible areas, but the classification of certain elements can be challenging. This study presents a new mapping method using unmanned aerial vehicles, RGB, and multispectral surveys, as well as machine learning and geomorphic mapping techniques. The method was successfully applied to map mudflats on the Atlantic coast of France, achieving high classification accuracy and demonstrating its potential for application in other ecosystems.
Remote sensing is a relevant method to map inaccessible areas, such as intertidal mudflats. However, image classification is challenging due to spectral similarity between microphytobenthos and oyster reefs. Because these elements are strongly related to local geomorphic features, including biogenic structures, a new mapping method has been developed to overcome the current obstacles. This method is based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), RGB, and multispectral (four bands: green, red, red-edge, and near-infrared) surveys that combine high spatial resolution (e.g., 5 cm pixel), geomorphic mapping, and machine learning random forest (RF) classification. A mudflat on the Atlantic coast of France (Marennes-Oleron bay) was surveyed based on this method and by using the structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetric approach to produce orthophotographs and digital surface models (DSM). Eight classes of mudflat surface based on indexes, such as NDVI and spectral bands normalised to NIR, were identified either on the whole image (i.e., standard RF classification) or after segmentation into five geomorphic units mapped from DSM (i.e., geomorphic-based RF classification). The classification accuracy was higher with the geomorphic-based RF classification (93.12%) than with the standard RF classification (73.45%), showing the added value of combining topographic and radiometric data to map soft-bottom intertidal areas and the user-friendly potential of this method in applications to other ecosystems, such as wetlands or peatlands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available