4.7 Article

Investigating the Bond Strength of FRP Laminates with Concrete Using LIGHT GBM and SHAPASH Analysis

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 14, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14214717

Keywords

FRP; interfacial bond strength; statistical analyses; LIGHT GBM; XGBoost; ensemble models; SHAPASH analysis

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [GRANT819]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research evaluated the nonlinear capabilities of three ensemble models for predicting the interfacial bond strength (IBS) of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) laminates on concrete prisms containing grooves. The study found that the LIGHT GBM model had the highest accuracy and prediction ability.
The corrosion of steel reinforcement necessitates regular maintenance and repair of a variety of reinforced concrete structures. Retrofitting of beams, joints, columns, and slabs frequently involves the use of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) laminates. In order to develop simple prediction models for calculating the interfacial bond strength (IBS) of FRP laminates on a concrete prism containing grooves, this research evaluated the nonlinear capabilities of three ensemble methods-namely, random forest (RF) regression, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LIGHT GBM) models-based on machine learning (ML). In the present study, the IBS was the desired variable, while the model comprised five input parameters: elastic modulus x thickness of FRP (EfTf), width of FRP plate (b(f)), concrete compressive strength (f(c)'), width of groove (b(g)), and depth of groove (h(g)). The optimal parameters for each ensemble model were selected based on trial-and-error methods. The aforementioned models were trained on 70% of the entire dataset, while the remaining data (i.e., 30%) were used for the validation of the developed models. The evaluation was conducted on the basis of reliable accuracy indices. The minimum value of correlation of determination (R-2 = 0.82) was observed for the testing data of the RF regression model. In contrast, the highest (R-2 = 0.942) was obtained for LIGHT GBM for the training data. Overall, the three models showed robust performance in terms of correlation and error evaluation; however, the trend of accuracy was obtained as follows: LIGHT GBM > XGBoost > RF regression. Owing to the superior performance of LIGHT GBM, it may be considered a reliable ML prediction technique for computing the bond strength of FRP laminates and concrete prisms. The performance of the models was further supplemented by comparing the slopes of regression lines between the observed and predicted values, along with error analysis (i.e., mean absolute error (MAE), and root-mean-square error (RMSE)), predicted-to-experimental ratio, and Taylor diagrams. Moreover, the SHAPASH analysis revealed that the elastic modulus x thickness of FRP and width of FRP plate are the factors most responsible for IBS in FRP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available