4.7 Article

Sterilization of PLA after Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Evaluation on Inherent Sterility and the Impossibility of Autoclavation

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15020369

Keywords

3D printing; fused filament fabrication; sterilization; autoclaving; polylactic acid; thermal deformation; traumatology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional printing, particularly fused filament fabrication (FFF), has great potential in (bio-)medical applications, but the challenge lies in the sterilization of the printed parts. This study examines the feasibility of autoclaving as a solution for FFF-printed parts and explores the possibility of inherent sterilization through the printing process itself. The research demonstrates that autoclaving can effectively sterilize parts with diameters ranging from 5-10 mm, but finer parts experience significant deformations. In such cases, the printer itself can be considered for inherent sterilization, as it applies heat at higher levels than autoclaving during the printing process.
Three-dimensional printing, especially fused filament fabrication (FFF), offers great possibilities in (bio-)medical applications, but a major downside is the difficulty in sterilizing the produced parts. This study evaluates the questions of whether autoclaving is a possible solution for FFF-printed parts and if the printer itself could be seen as an inherent sterilization method. In a first step, an investigation was performed on the deformation of cylindrically shaped test parts after running them through the autoclaving process. Furthermore, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printing process itself were evaluated using culture medium sterility tests. It could be shown that, depending on the needed accuracy, parts down to a diameter of 5-10 mm can still be sterilized using autoclaving, while finer parts suffer from major deformations. For these, inherent sterilization of the printer itself is an option. During the printing process, over a certain contact time, heat at a higher level than that used in autoclaving is applied to the printed parts. The contact time, depending on the printing parameters, is calculated using the established formula. The results show that for stronger parts, autoclaving offers a cheap and good option for sterilization after FFF-printing. However, the inherent sterility possibilities of the printer itself can be considered, especially when printing with small layer heights for finer parts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available