4.6 Article

Deep reinforcement learning for optimal experimental design in biology

Journal

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010695

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [770835]
  2. Canada's Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [770835] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field of optimal experimental design utilizes mathematical techniques to identify experiments with maximal information content. In this study, a reinforcement learning technique is applied to achieve optimal experimental design for maximizing confidence in model parameter estimates. Results demonstrate that reinforcement learning outperforms other algorithms, such as one-step ahead optimization and model predictive control, in inferring bacterial growth parameters in a simulated chemostat. Moreover, reinforcement learning is shown to be robust to parametric uncertainty, as it can be trained over a distribution of parameters.
The field of optimal experimental design uses mathematical techniques to determine experiments that are maximally informative from a given experimental setup. Here we apply a technique from artificial intelligence-reinforcement learning-to the optimal experimental design task of maximizing confidence in estimates of model parameter values. We show that a reinforcement learning approach performs favourably in comparison with a one-step ahead optimisation algorithm and a model predictive controller for the inference of bacterial growth parameters in a simulated chemostat. Further, we demonstrate the ability of reinforcement learning to train over a distribution of parameters, indicating that this approach is robust to parametric uncertainty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available