4.6 Article

Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR)
  2. Australian Antarctic Science Program [4296, 4297]
  3. Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment -Equity Trustees Charitable Foundation
  4. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  5. Royal Commission
  6. NERC
  7. British Antarctic Survey `Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation' Team
  8. Environment Office
  9. NERC-CONICYT [NE/P003079/1]
  10. Carlsberg Foundation [CF18-0267]
  11. CDR [J.0152.18]
  12. BelSPO project [BR/165/A1/MICROBIAN]
  13. NSF OPP [1840058, 1744794]
  14. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (Ministry of Science and Innovation) [CTM2016-79741-R]
  15. Directorate For Geosciences
  16. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1840058, 1744794] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity is under multiple threats, and current conservation efforts are deemed insufficient. A participatory study estimates that up to 65% of native terrestrial taxa and land-associated seabirds may decline by 2100. Implementing 10 key threat management strategies could benefit up to 84% of Antarctic taxa.
Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity faces multiple threats, from invasive species to climate change. Yet no large-scale assessments of threat management strategies exist. Applying a structured participatory approach, we demonstrate that existing conservation efforts are insufficient in a changing world, estimating that 65% (at best 37%, at worst 97%) of native terrestrial taxa and land-associated seabirds are likely to decline by 2100 under current trajectories. Emperor penguins are identified as the most vulnerable taxon, followed by other seabirds and dry soil nematodes. We find that implementing 10 key threat management strategies in parallel, at an estimated present-day equivalent annual cost of US$23 million, could benefit up to 84% of Antarctic taxa. Climate change is identified as the most pervasive threat to Antarctic biodiversity and influencing global policy to effectively limit climate change is the most beneficial conservation strategy. However, minimising impacts of human activities and improved planning and management of new infrastructure projects are cost-effective and will help to minimise regional threats. Simultaneous global and regional efforts are critical to secure Antarctic biodiversity for future generations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available