4.6 Article

The evolutionary dynamics that retain long neutral genomic sequences in face of indel deletion bias: a model and its application to human introns

Journal

OPEN BIOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.220223

Keywords

indel; intron; deletion bias; c-value paradox; genome evolution; border-induced selection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses the evolutionary events of insertions and deletions of short DNA segments, proposes the phenomenon of border-induced selection, and develops corresponding dynamic models to explore the topic.
Insertions and deletions (indels) of short DNA segments are common evolutionary events. Numerous studies showed that deletions occur more often than insertions in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. It raises the question why neutral sequences are not eradicated from the genome. We suggest that this is due to a phenomenon we term border-induced selection. Accordingly, a neutral sequence is bordered between conserved regions. Deletions occurring near the borders occasionally protrude to the conserved region and are thereby subject to strong purifying selection. Thus, for short neutral sequences, an insertion bias is expected. Here, we develop a set of increasingly complex models of indel dynamics that incorporate border-induced selection. Furthermore, we show that short conserved sequences within the neutrally evolving sequence help explain: (i) the presence of very long sequences; (ii) the high variance of sequence lengths; and (iii) the possible emergence of multimodality in sequence length distributions. Finally, we fitted our models to the human intron length distribution, as introns are thought to be mostly neutral and bordered by conserved exons. We show that when accounting for the occurrence of short conserved sequences within introns, we reproduce the main features, including the presence of long introns and the multimodality of intron distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available