4.5 Article

Genome-wide identification and phylogenetic analysis of the chalcone synthase gene family in rice

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 95-105

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-016-0871-7

Keywords

Rice; OsPKS; Phylogenetic analysis; Gene family

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31160062, 31660385]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China [20122BAB214017]
  3. Foundation of Jiangxi Province Education Department, Jiangxi, China [GJJ12242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The enzymes of the chalcone synthase family are also known as type III polyketide synthases (PKS), and produce a series of secondary metabolites in bacteria, fungi and plants. In a number of plants, genes encoding PKS comprise a large multigene family. Currently, detailed reports on rice (Oryza sativa) PKS (OsPKS) family genes and tissue expression profiling are limited. Here, 27 candidate OsPKS genes were identified in the rice genome,and 23 gene structures were confirmed by EST and cDNA sequencing; phylogenetic analysis has indicated that these 23 OsPKS members could be clustered into three groups (I-III). Comparative analysis has shown OsPKS08 and OsPKS26 could be classified with the CHS genes of other species. Two members OsPKS10 and OsPKS21 were grouped into anther specific chalcone synthase-like (ASCL) clade. Intron/exon structure analysis revealed that nearly all of the OsPKS members contained one phase-1 intron at a conserved Cys. Analysis of chromosomal localization and genome distribution showed that some of the members were distributed on a chromosome as a cluster. Expression data exhibited widespread distribution of the rice OsPKS gene family within plant tissues, suggesting functional diversification of the OsPKS genes. Our results will contribute to future study of the complexity of the OsPKS gene family in rice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available