4.1 Article

Sociodemographic Correlates of Affordable Community Behavioral Health Treatment Facility Availability in Florida: A Cross-Sectional Study

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-022-09828-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the availability of behavioral health treatment facilities in Florida by assessing neighborhood-level sociodemographic attributes. The results showed that the density of these facilities was negatively associated with rurality and positively associated with the proportion of non-Latino Black, Latino, insured, and college-educated populations. The findings highlight the rural-urban disparities in behavioral health treatment availability and suggest the need for telehealth and mobile interventions to improve treatment utilization.
Behavioral health disorders such as mental disorders (MD) and substance use disorders (SUD) are epidemics in the US; however, the availability of treatment and prevention services remains low. This study assessed neighborhood-level sociodemographic attributes to characterize the availability of behavioral health treatment facilities in Florida. The American Community Survey and SAMHSA's Behavioral Health Treatment Locator were used to identify behavioral health treatment facilities in Florida and calculate their density by census tract. Spatial lag regression models were used to assess census tract-level correlates of facility density for 390 MD treatment facilities, 518 SUD facilities, and subsets of affordable MD and SUD facilities. Behavioral health treatment facility density was negatively associated with rurality and positively associated with the proportion of non-Latino Black, Latino, insured, and college-educated populations. Stark rural-urban disparities in behavioral health treatment availability present opportunities to prioritize telehealth and mobile interventions and improve treatment utilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available