4.6 Article

Ibrutinib inhibits BTK-driven NF-κB p65 activity to overcome bortezomib-resistance in multiple myeloma

Journal

CELL CYCLE
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages 2367-2375

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2014.998067

Keywords

BTK; bortezomib; drug-resistance; ibrutinib; multiple myeloma; NF-kappa B

Categories

Funding

  1. NIHR
  2. Big C Appeal, Worldwide Cancer Research
  3. Humane Research Trust
  4. Worldwide Cancer Research [12-0014] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a haematologic malignancy characterized by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. Over the last 10-15 y the introduction of the proteasome-inhibitor bortezomib has improved MM prognosis, however relapse due to bortezomib-resistance is inevitable and the disease, at present, remains incurable. To model bortezomib-resistant MM we generated bortezomib-resistant MM cell lines (n = 4 ) and utilised primary malignant plasma cells from patients relapsing after bortezomib treatment (n = 6 ). We identified enhanced Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) activity in bortezomib-resistant MM cells and found that inhibition of BTK, either pharmacologically with ibrutinib (0.5M) or via lenti-viral miRNA-targeted BTK interference, re-sensitized previously bortezomib-resistant MM cells to further bortezomib therapy at a physiologically relevant concentration (5nM). Further analysis of pro-survival signaling revealed a role for the NF-B p65 subunit in MM bortezomib-resistance, thus a combination of BTK and NF-B p65 inhibition, either pharmacologically or via further lenti-viral miRNA NF-B p65 interference, also restored sensitivity to bortezomib, significantly reducing cell viability (37.5 +/- 6 .9 %, ANOVA P 0 .001). Accordingly, we propose the clinical evaluation of a bortezomib/ibrutinib combination therapy, including in patients resistant to single-agent bortezomib.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available