4.3 Article

Circulating Peptidome Is Strongly Altered in COVID-19 Patients

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021564

Keywords

COVID-19; peptidomics; protein degradation; biomarkers; respiratory disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used an untargeted peptidomic approach to investigate the alterations of circulating peptides in COVID-19 patients. The results showed that peptide abundance is inversely correlated with disease severity and identified peptides related to inflammation, immune response, and coagulation processes. Additionally, changes in protein degradation patterns may be involved in the progression of the disease.
Whilst the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the host proteome, metabolome, and lipidome has been largely investigated in different bio-fluids, to date, the circulating peptidome remains unexplored. Thus, the present study aimed to apply an untargeted peptidomic approach to provide insight into alterations of circulating peptides in the development and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The circulating peptidome from COVID-19 severe and mildly symptomatic patients and negative controls was characterized using LC-MS/MS analysis for identification and quantification purposes. Database search and statistical analysis allowed a complete characterization of the plasma peptidome and the detection of the most significant modulated peptides that were impacted by the infection. Our results highlighted not only that peptide abundance inversely correlates with disease severity, but also the involvement of biomolecules belonging to inflammatory, immune-response, and coagulation proteins/processes. Moreover, our data suggested a possible involvement of changes in protein degradation patterns. In the present research, for the first time, the untargeted peptidomic approach enabled the identification of circulating peptides potentially playing a crucial role in the progression of COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available