4.3 Article

Face Thermal Map of the Mexican Population in the Basal State

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114208

Keywords

thermal map; basal state; face; region of interest; Mexican population

Funding

  1. CONACYT [320976]
  2. Ave Fenix Group
  3. cancer survivors group
  4. Mexican Council of Science and Technology
  5. [2019-000002-01NACF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, thermal images of the human body, especially in the face, have been widely used for various purposes such as epidemiology, clinical analysis, and psychology. This study created a facial thermal map of the Mexican population in the basal state and compared different population groups based on gender, age, and clinical status. Statistical differences were found in certain regions of interest, indicating the potential applications of thermal analysis in various fields.
There has been a wide use of thermal images of the human body in recent years, specifically images with thermal information of regions of interest (ROI) in the face; this information can be used for epidemiological, clinical, and/or psychological purposes. Due to this, it is important to have plenty of information on temperature in these ROIs in the basal state that allows their use as a reference in terms of their thermal analysis. In this work, a face thermal map of the Mexican population in the basal state (n = 196) is created, adding the comparison between different population groups, such as gender, age, and clinical status, obtaining results of great interest for future research. The t-test for independent samples was applied to the ROIs with normal distribution and Mann-Whitney u-test to the ones that did not present normal distribution. Statistically significant differences were found in some of the ROI comparisons like the corrugator, the supraorbitals, and the chin between the control and clinical groups, as well as in the differentiation by age (p < 0.05).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available