4.3 Article

Understanding Cancer Survivorship among Firefighters: A Mixed-Method Study

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010257

Keywords

survivorship; occupational health; cancer; mixed methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines cancer survivorship among firefighters and finds that they are exposed to unique carcinogens, but there is limited research on this topic. The results show that firefighters who are cancer survivors have lower levels of emotional well-being but higher quality of life in physical, social, and functional well-being.
Background: Firefighters are exposed to a unique set of carcinogens through their work environment that predispose them to several cancers, yet there is limited research related to cancer survivorship amongst this occupational group. Methods: A mixed-method approach was used to assess cancer survivorship amongst firefighters. Four focus groups and one in-depth interview were conducted with 29 active and retired firefighters who have been diagnosed with cancer to understand the experiences and challenges associated with cancer survivorship in the fire service and desired resources. Qualitative data were analyzed using Nvivo software. All participants completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) survey to assess their quality of life. Results: The primary themes that emerged from the focus groups included managing health and well-being changes, navigating support systems in place, and accessing new resources. FACT-G scores (mean +/- standard deviation) of the firefighter cancer survivor sample demonstrate relatively lower levels of emotional well-being (19.26 +/- 4.67) and higher quality of life in the physical well-being (23.67 +/- 5.08), social well-being (23.38 +/- 4.16), and functional well-being (22.6 +/- 4.966) domains. Conclusions: Firefighters requested curated resources, such as support groups and department training resources, supporting the need for more cancer survivorship resources specific to firefighters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available