4.3 Article

Economic Impact of the Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in a Bariatric Patient Undergoing a Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214946

Keywords

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; economic analysis; pharmacological costs; surgical material costs; surgical time costs; complementary test costs; bed occupancy costs

Funding

  1. Fundacion Universidad Alfonso X-Banco Santander [1.012.027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the economic cost of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery following an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol with a standard-of-care protocol. The results showed that patients following the ERAS protocol had significantly lower postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting, and hospital stay. In terms of economics, the pharmacological expenditures, costs of complementary tests during the hospital stay, and costs related to the hospital stay were significantly lower in the ERAS group, resulting in a mean saving of $1458.62 per patient in the total cost of the procedure.
Introduction: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have proven to be cost-effective in various surgical procedures, mainly in colorectal surgeries. However, there is still little scientific evidence evaluating the economic impact of their application in bariatric surgery. The present study aimed to compare the economic cost of performing a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following an ERAS protocol, with the costs of following a standard-of-care protocol. Patients and methods: A prospective non-randomized study of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients following an ERAS protocol and patients following a standard-of-care protocol. The total costs of the procedure were subdivided into pharmacological expenditures, surgical material, and time expenses, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and costs related to the hospital stay. Results: The 84 patients included 58 women (69%) and 26 men (31%) with a mean age of 44.3 +/- 11.6 years. There were no significant differences in age, gender, and distribution of comorbidities between groups. Postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting, and hospital stay were significantly lower within the ERAS group. The pharmacological expenditures, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and the costs related to the hospital stay, were significantly lower in the ERAS group. There were no significant differences in the surgical material and surgical time costs between groups. Globally, the total cost of the procedure was significantly lower in the ERAS group with a mean saving of 1458.62$ per patient. The implementation of an ERAS protocol implied a mean saving of 21.25% of the total cost of the procedure. Conclusions: The implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly reduces the perioperative cost of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available